Technology Gavin Newsom signs California social media overhaul for minors

Gavin Newsom signs California social media overhaul for minors


- Advertisment -

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, a law that mandates additional safeguards for minors on social media. The bill, AB 2273, was passed by the state legislature in August and is expected to go into effect on July 1, 2024.

AB 2273’s supporters presented it as an addition to federal online child protection laws, which apply to children under 13. The law raises the age limit to 18 and includes web services that are “likely” to receive underage visitors, not just those aimed at children. These sites must assess the potential harm to children on their platform, limit the collection and sharing of data for these users, and attempt to estimate the ages of children on the platform. A press release from the Newsom office describes it as creating sites “in the best interests of underage users and defaults to privacy and safety that protect the mental and physical health and well-being of children.”

But critics have pointed out that numerous red flags, especially the vague terms and broad scope of the bill. Sites, especially smaller ones, can have problems interpret and comply the guidelines. And in an effort to avoid liability, some could turn to invasive age-verification protocols, which would compromise the anonymity of both adult users and children. A state commission should deliver a report with more details in January 2024, with more concrete best practices in theory.

The signing follows Newsom’s similar approval of AB 587, a less restrictive rule requiring sites to post moderation guidelines online.

Both laws can face challenges in court. NetChoice, which has successfully brought social media laws to a halt in Texas and Florida, today issued a statement challenging Newsom’s decision. “While AB 2273’s motive is well-intentioned, many of the means chosen are constitutional and could have unintended consequences,” said Chris Marchese, counsel for NetChoice. “The law violates the First Amendment by cooling constitutionally protected speech and infringing the editorial rights of websites, platforms and apps of all sizes and ideologies.” But so far no lawsuit has come – and if not, site operators will have to prepare to childproof their platforms.

Shreya Christina
Shreya has been with for 3 years, writing copy for client websites, blog posts, EDMs and other mediums to engage readers and encourage action. By collaborating with clients, our SEO manager and the wider team, Shreya seeks to understand an audience before creating memorable, persuasive copy.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

The Untold Truth of Tig Notaro’s Wife – Stephanie Allynne

Who is Stephanie Allynne? Born on September 19, 1986 in Claremont, California, USA, Stephanie Allynne is an actress, but possibly...

Are people throwing away your company swag? Five tips for better end-of-year gifts

Lou Elliott-Cysewski, co-founder and CEO of Coolperxthe world's first climate-neutral branded goods company. It's the dirty little secret of corporate...

How companies can accelerate transformation

Couldn't attend Transform 2022? Check out all the top sessions in our on-demand library now! Look here....

3 No-Brainer Stocks to Buy During the Bear Market

The stock market is definitely in bear market territory and is now flirting with new 2022 lows. Clearly significant...
- Advertisement -

NASA’s Artemis I Launch Has Been Officially Delayed Until November

Hurricane Ian arrived in Florida as a Category 4 hurricane, but weakened to a tropical storm by the time...

Meta plans workforce freeze, NASA shoots down an asteroid, and Elon’s tweets are made public •

Hello all! Welcome back to Week in Review, the newsletter where we quickly list some of the most-read...

Must read

- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you